For most of us, evolution has been taught to us as a fact. The theory stated that man evolved from apes. This idea of ‘the evolution of man chart’ has been having major setbacks over the last few decades. As a matter of fact the whole idea seems to be completely unraveling.
Our schools and universities are teaching us that the evolution theory is gaining scientific evidence with each new discovery. For the person that is willing to scratch just a little beneath the surface (look other places other than typical textbooks and nature shows) the evidence is just the opposite.
The last few decades have revealed a very large number of problems with the theory of evolution.
There’s a plan afoot among evolutionary scientists to launch a big new project — to look back in time and find out how climate change over millions of years affected human evolution.
The idea of human evolution has been hit, perhaps, the hardest of all. Those that have researched the human evolution chart may realize that the foundation has been extremely poor at best. The pressure to find links between apes and man has caused the acceptance of hoaxes, frauds and junk science. Whether we look at Java Man (which used very poor scientific methods), Piltdown Man (a fraud that was very instrumental in establishing the idea of human evolution from apes for more than forty years) or the well published Nebraska Man (it was drawn from one tooth that was eventually determined to be a tooth from an extinct pig), the specimens have not turned out to be very good.
Since those beginning days the examples have not improved much. The fossils of the Australopithecus (the much publicized Lucy being included) are apparently nothing more than apes. The only verifiable fossils appear to be all ape or all human. And this includes the 100% human Neanderthals. There is no fossil found to tie the apes and humans together.
Scientific advancements have not helped the idea of apes evolving into humans. It used to be thought that the difference between apes and humans was approximately 3% (DNA evidence, structure of the cell as well as other factors). In reality, 3% is an incredibly huge difference and would take tens of millions of years to evolve even with ideal conditions. (The human evolution process from apes supposedly occurred in the last 3 or 4 million years.)
New evidence is revealing a difference of closer to 10%. This complicates the issue by multiplying the amount of time needed for the evolution of man (Because of all of the new discoveries in micro-biology). The amount of time that was given in the past for humans to evolve from apes is just a fraction of the time that is needed according to the evolution timetables. And that is if everything went just right.
This doesn’t even take into account the fact that the vehicle for this evolution to take place is through mutations. Mutations are always harmful, deadly or, at best neutral so that the process of evolution could have never taken place through mutations. Mutations are always a subtraction of information from the creature of organism. (One example of this is Down’s Syndrome in humans).
There is absolutely no verification in any way that indicates that apes evolved into humans. Or, for that matter, that both of them could have evolved from the same creature.
So what are we looking at when we see the ‘evolution of man charts’? Just apes and humans arranged with ingenuity, imagination and creativity thrown in.
These attributes may be needed to produce literature, poetry and drama productions. But it has no place in science.
Next: Learn additional facts that add to the problems of the evolution of man chart [http://www.evolutionguy.com]. The information at [http://www.evolutionguy.com] will help all of those that have learned the ‘facts of evolution’. These stunning facts at this site reveal many more problems with the theory of evolution.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Justian_Philips
Human History 